As crises grip colleges, more students than ever are set to enroll

After he took office in January, his administration almost immediately began a campaign to close the Education Department and stop billions of dollars from flowing to colleges. On campuses, universities are shutting down laboratories and confronting civil rights investigations over antisemitism.

As about 3.9 million students earn their high school diplomas and many of them head to college, the changes could affect their experiences in big and small ways.

Here’s how the commotion might touch students, their parents and anyone else around college campuses this year.

The United States has close to 4,000 degree-granting colleges and universities that offer everything from associate’s degrees in nursing to doctorates in history. But challenges are just about everywhere in higher education right now.

The kind of federal budget cuts the Trump administration is pursuing could be the most damaging to universities where research is integral to the campus’s culture and structure. That includes places like the University of Pennsylvania and Johns Hopkins University, but also schools like Kansas State University. Some have already announced layoffs or hiring freezes, and may be forced to rework their course offerings.

It is unclear how much belt tightening there will be, and how it might affect undergraduates in the fall.

Regional public universities often receive less attention but are very much the backbone of higher education for millions of people. They have not been as targeted by the Trump administration, but they still face fundamental challenges around state budget fights, increasing day-to-day costs and declining enrollments.

On some campuses, students are finding reduced services and staffing, with fewer professors, diminished academic resources and buildings that are closed more frequently.

There is proposed change, and then there is actual change.

Trump’s effort to dismantle the Education Department puts two federal programs in limbo: Pell Grants and student loans.

Linda McMahon, the secretary of education, said during her confirmation hearing that she wanted to expand the Pell Grant program, which is for low-income students. It isn’t clear, however, which agency or entity would administer the grants if the Education Department were to go away.

On Friday, Trump said the Small Business Administration would “immediately” take over the federal student loan portfolio. The Student Borrower Protection Center called his idea “illegal, unserious and a distraction.”

Given the enormity of the loan program, any quick transfer seems highly unlikely. Until Congress or federal courts get involved -- and both may happen before long -- the application process for financial aid and loans won’t change. The FAFSA, short for Free Application for Federal Student Aid, has been working better so far this application season after a rough redesign of the application. But it’s not clear how recent Education Department layoffs will affect the process.

Diversity, equity and inclusion programs had once seemed like a good idea to many universities, even a necessity, as they sought to increase their enrollments in a competitive landscape. But a backlash has driven state lawmakers to take up legislation to eliminate such programs, and now the Trump administration is also attacking them.

Universities are responding in varying ways.

Sometimes schools have simply renamed their DEI operations. Other universities been more aggressive. In March 2024, the University of Florida fired its 13-member DEI staff in response to a state ban, for example.

On some campuses, students will very likely feel the differences.

The University of Virginia pulled trainings on topics such as DEI and microaggressions from its website. At the University of Houston, the campus newspaper announced that an LGBTQ+ center was being shut after Texas banned diversity programming in colleges and universities. At the University of North Florida, an LGBTQ+ center, a women’s center, an interfaith center and an intercultural center were all shuttered.

At Missouri State University in January, students protested the elimination of an annual diversity conference as well as an “inclusive excellence” gala.

There remain holdouts. In a recent meeting with the faculty senate at Amherst College in Massachusetts, its president, Michael Elliott, called Trump’s orders ambiguous, and said Amherst would make no cuts.

Schools that have seen major protests over the war in the Gaza Strip could face blunt-force pressure from Washington to change discipline and other institutional policies related to protests, and even curriculum related to the Middle East.

Republican efforts to curb diversity programming could extend into the classroom. Long before Trump began his second term, some states, including Florida, tried to sideline ideas from college curricula that lawmakers considered left-leaning.

The Supreme Court’s decision in 2023 to strike down race-conscious admissions has upended nearly 50 years of court precedent and university policies, and the effect on admissions especially at the nation’s most selective institutions may be unclear for years to come.

Statistics are in for the class that entered in the fall, and they broadly show a decrease in the number of Black students enrolled. Some differences were stark, as at Harvard Law School, which enrolled 19 Black first-year students last fall, compared with 43 the year before.

But there are some exceptions to the trend. And given the difficulty of comparing different counting methods across universities, officials have been reluctant to predict how the future will play out.

Schools are trying to maintain diversity by stepping up financial aid and recruitment, particularly in rural areas. Several universities, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard University, are offering free tuition for students whose families earn $200,000 and below.

The court also left open the possibility that universities could consider race in the context of life challenges, especially as students presented them in application essays. But critics of affirmative action, like Students for Fair Admissions, which brought the Supreme Court case, are ready to challenge universities if they see any hint of any decisions based on race.

Anti-affirmative action groups will also be scrutinizing measures like SAT scores, if they can get them, to see whether universities are using different standards for different races and ethnicities.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.